SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hawkmoon who wrote (136106)6/9/2004 10:33:29 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha  Respond to of 281500
 
>>>Either way, it seriously calls into question his personal integrity and character.<<

Maybe.

But does it call in to question his correctness in determining what was said and where we are today?

I think not.

Or maybe you would like to " interrogate " a few others that haven't been subjects of entrapment.

So far..the alleged “ pedophiles “ are right..and the " ???? " are wrong.

That's something you just can't wish away Hawk.

KC



To: Hawkmoon who wrote (136106)6/10/2004 4:00:49 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
<But a 14 year old IS.. And he was caught once before (and it was hushed up) trying to bait such a young girl into meeting him>

Hawk, I'm going to persevere, not because I think that Scott Ritter is Mr NiceGuy wrongly accused, but because I've seen too much in my life of piling on, false accusations, character assassination and so on to just accept more.

Has he been convicted of something? If not, then the case is obviously permeable at best and pathetic at worst.

So, who was doing the "hushing up"? If I was the father, it wouldn't be me. If I was the prosecutor, it wouldn't be me. If I was his employer, not me again. If the police investigating, I'd want him dealt with. The judge won't have done it. So who hushed it up and for what purpose? Not many people are in favour of paedophilia.

Did he know said 14 year old was 14 or did she pretend to be 17? I've seen enough of cute little 14 year olds to know that they are not all registered cuties. Some are malevolent little lying pieces of work, having a lot of fun at somebody else's expense.

People can put on a good act in cyberspace. Here's another 14 year old who seemed like an adult. Subject 36887 You might even have conversed with him yourself.

Let's see the prosecution's case.

Then, even if guilty, it's akin to saying President Kennedy was a philanderer and therefore he was obviously wrong about Nikita's nukes in Cuba. They are separate issues. Clinton has admitted to fellatio in the Oval Office, but that doesn't mean he was wrong on dealing with Mexico's debt or appointing Uncle Al to run Uncle Sam's money supply.

How does being a controversial public figure protect one against prosecution in the USA? Kenny Boy's cronies were prosecuted. Martha Stewart too. The USA is great like that. It's the high jump for the crooks. High and mighty though they might be. Clinton was running scared. Nixon was sacked.

Mqurice