SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Amy J who wrote (21494)6/10/2004 11:56:24 AM
From: TradeliteRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
<<Has there ever been a time the increase was 45% in one year.
If that's not a bubble...>>

I know this is going to sound radical, and I'm not sure of its validity myself, but there have been voices out there for a couple years wondering whether real estate has simply been underpriced for a while, and is reacting to pent-up demand.

I heard these voices several years ago in my area of the country, and no less than Mark Haines on CNBC asked the same question of a guest on the program a few months ago.

Only time will tell. Many people want to own their homes, instead of renting...that's a given. The degree to which lower interest rates fueled their desire and ability to buy homes and will keep doing so....only several more years worth of history will decide.

If rates go really high and stop it all, but then drop and the same scenario repeats itself, that might indicate there was no bubble, just pent-up demand....maybe. I don't really know.



To: Amy J who wrote (21494)6/10/2004 11:58:14 AM
From: GraceZRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 306849
 
It was an actual question not a rhetorical one.

Again, if there is anyone who can answer, has the person with the median income ever had enough income to afford the median house for sale in CA?