SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Piffer Thread on Political Rantings and Ravings -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (13945)6/10/2004 6:12:02 PM
From: Alan Smithee  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
If we have to put up with the thought police, it
would surely be helpful if they'd publish some sort
of written guidelines.........<g>

The guidelines are fluid, and are changed depending on context. Relevant issues are a) who is being discussed, b) what was that person's political orientation, c) how does that orientation fit in with the agenda of the thought police, and so on. You get the drift.

Written guidelines would not work, because they would just be guidelines, freely changed upon a whim.



To: mph who wrote (13945)6/10/2004 7:21:25 PM
From: Augustus Gloop  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14610
 
<<verbotem>>

Hey.....if your going to use big words could you please include the definition for those of us who live in Wisconsin? <g>



To: mph who wrote (13945)6/10/2004 10:45:42 PM
From: Rainy_Day_Woman  Respond to of 14610
 
thought police

isn't that verboten?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News