Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (190286)	6/11/2004 11:09:47 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1577893

OK, let's start with George Bush, who diverted our resources away from the assholes that did 9/11 to the people that didn't. Al Qaeda should be 90% eliminated by now, almost 3 years later, instead we are in Iraq and they grow stronger and stronger. Pure idiocy. I'm sorry, but you are so ignorant on this issue you simply can't discuss it. The military people dealing with Al Qaeda are getting everything they want and ask for. Al Qaeda has been hit hard in the past three years, and those who know about the subject (which excludes YOU) say this is precisely the reason they've hit only soft targets since. Nobody who is knowledgeable and unbiased on this subject believes Al Qaeda is as strong today as it was 3 years ago. Nobody. The supposition that Al Qaeda should be "90% eliminated" by now is clearly reflective of how ignorant you are on this issue. What, precisely, could the United States have done differently that would have yielded better results in fighting Al Qaeda. No idiot liberal spin, please. How about a detailed statement of what you believe?