SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (48901)6/12/2004 12:02:11 AM
From: Joe S Pack  Respond to of 89467
 
Congrates on your radio appearance and future engagements.

-Nat



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (48901)6/13/2004 8:40:05 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
So, Numbers Don't Lie, Hmmm?

Alex Wallenwein

Think again.

Unfortunately, large hedge funds that are able to move gazillions of ounces of gold on paper - and thereby are able to severely affect gold's paper-price, take these numbers as øgospel.'

Let's look at them in turn and see what happened this time BLS Payroll Numbers Report for May 2004, reported Friday June 5, 2004)

a. Payroll Numbers

Remember the last two times these magical numbers were revealed for the months of March and April? Remember the effect these revelations had on the markets? Both had the exact same effect, although the first one for March was far stronger since it was such a "surprise": The dollar shot up, bonds, the euro, and US stock markets tanked, and gold got hammered.

What happened this time?

Last Friday the numbers were slightly lower but still darn close to President Bush's promised figures. (Question: How could the president promise or even predict such numbers when there was not one economist or "expert" to be found by financial news reporters who could agree with any other on what the numbers would be, let alone predict the actual outcome?)

But, what was the effect?

The dollar tanked, and stocks, the euro, and gold shot up in perfect unison while bonds took somewhat of a hit, although well within recent trading ranges.

Explanations, anyone?

The press dutifully stepped up to the plate and offered the following:

Reuters noted that the jobs data, although good, "failed to inspire" currency traders because an expected June increase in the Fed's short-term interest rate is already priced into the market. Hence, the dollar did not rise this time. That's a good explanation for its failure to rise - but why did it actually fall?

The problem is that it did in fact rise early on after the DOL news release. What caused it to reverse itself and head back down? Terrorism fears? Nothing happened on Friday during the time frame in question that would justify such a move. An oil price shock? Nope. Oil prices dropped into the $38 range in the aftermath of OPEC's decision on Thursday to cut output. Did the euro get an independent boost? Wrong again. No news on that front.

The bottom line is that the dollar bear-rally has fizzled out. The greenback is due for another down leg unless the Fed unexpectedly tightens by a half-point on June 30 - but that isn't going to happen.

b. Inflation Numbers

Inflationary expectations - and actually rising prices - are being downplayed for all its worth, because the truth of the matter remains that the Fed really can't afford to raise rates at all, much less aggressively so. Inflation remains, and is increasingly becoming an even bigger factor in everyone's spending decisions, but the lies continue to pour in. Long term rates are already in a sharp uptrend. If short term rates are perceived as destined to join them, business borrowing will come to a halt, given the fact that it has been so weak all along despite an unprecedented full year of absolute emergency-level rates.

(This was written on June 8, 2004. On June 9th, Al "The Jet" Greenspan as uttered some of his trademark supercharged hot-air statements - and the dollar shot up, driving gold and the euro down, way down. Today, June 10th, the dollar is already on its way back south and gold rose $2.50 by mid-morning. Events are now moving so breathtakingly fast that it's almost impossible to write a timely article anymore.)

Even if a sharper than anticipated rate hike should materialize - and there is no chance for that, given all the careful news-massaging you have observed during the last three months - the dollar will merely jump to a new short-term plateau. To sustain further rises, it will have to be followed by additional half-point hikes, and there is no way the economy will survive such an attack on liquidity.

Liquidity is the key point here, by the way. M3 is now rising at an annualized rate in excess of 20 percent. The last time this happened was in 1999 as a precaution during the run-up to the expected Y2K calamity. What calamity do they expect this time around?

Joel Skousen, editor of the World Affairs newsletter thinks it may be an expected terrorist attack of which the fedgov has advance knowledge, a planned attack on Taiwan by China, or a Russian attack on the US.

Although he makes a credible case for these possibilities, it seems more plausible that the Fed expects a serious drop in short term borrowing as a result of these coming rate hikes. Remember that the "multiplier effect" does not occur when - despite near 50-year low rates, nobody feels inclined to borrow money. That means the money supply does not grow and threatens to fall over time which then will cause serious deflationary pressures.

The point is that despite these low rates for more than a year now, borrowing by businesses has only recently begun to pick up again. With only barely an up-tick, the fed is already forced to tighten because actual inflation is beginning to run away from us - government numbers notwithstanding, of course.

There is a great article in the Dallas Morning News of May 24th by Scott Burns on why the government was able to keep the reported figures so low. It all boils down to rents and used car sales.

Rents make up a whopping 30 percent of the core CPI numbers. The same goes for used cars. Rents decreased because the Fed's emergency rates have lured everybody and their brother into buying homes, many of them people who could normally never afford one when rates were higher. At the same time there was an apartment building boom which led to a glut in residential rental space - and a concomitant price drop. Post-911 car financing options of zero-percent have caused a lot of people who would normally not have considered doing so to sell their old clunker and buy a brand new boy toy, leading to a glut in the used-car market.

Together, these two categories are responsible for two-thirds of the entire CPI! Add in lower electronics and power tool prices due to cheap imports form China and Asia in general, and you end up with a virtual "god-sent" for government numbers-crunchers under pressure to assure everyone that at least inflation was nothing to worry about.

Now, imagine what will happen to the CPI when rates rise again, pushing especially low-income ARM borrowers back out into the rental market when they can no longer hang on to their mushrooming mortgage payments! Likewise, what will happen to the used car market when these same people, who no longer have full time jobs and must do with less disposable income as a result of rising debt-service costs, have to sell their new fancy cars in order to reduce debt payments?

These developments alone - not even considering rising energy, gas, and raw materials costs due to the oil spike - will lift the CPI dramatically, forcing the Fed's hand in raising rates even further - and all that in an economic climate that can ill afford higher rates at all. Either the Fed will comply, raise rates, and squash whatever recovery we are now enjoying, or it will stand pat forcing the dollar to drop even faster.

This much-hailed "recovery" is nothing but a dead-cat bounce. This cat was dead long before it hit the ground. The only reason it bounced was that it hit "soft ground" - the soft perceptive acuities of mainstream borrowers and investors.

So much for my rant on CPI numbers.

c. ... and back to Payroll Numbers:

A very interesting observation was made by a reporter for the New York Times:

"The accelerating job growth, if it continues at or near the pace of the past three months, would save Bush from becoming the first chief executive since Herbert Hoover to preside over a decline in jobs during a four-year term. At the present pace, all of the 2.6 million jobs that were lost in the first 44 months of the Bush presidency would be recovered by August or September, barely in time for the election." DailyNews.com

Guess why the President has picked that 300,000 jobs per month figure - and guess why the figures turn out to reflect exactly that?

Can you expect this trend to continue until the election? Yep - because it's not a "trend" at all. It's a conscious decision to deceive, and as such can be carried on until both of the following happen: (a) somebody notices the lies, and (b) the press reports on it.

Now here comes the really big enigma - and the proof that these figures are in fact lies:

The same article reports fed governor Kohn as observing that the unemployment rate "has remained stable at 5.6% during the past six months."

Hang on a second!

How does that jibe with the claim that almost a million new jobs were created in the last three months alone?? I was never real strong in math, but my gut tells me there's something fishy here. If a total of 2.6 million workers lost their jobs during Bush's reign, and 1.4 million jobs were regained during that time, with 1.2 of those 1.4 million created this year alone, then why did that not visibly impact the unemployment rate during the last six months?

As you can see in the chart below, at its lowest point in recent history the unemployment rate bottomed out at 4% in late 2000. It has been in a confirmed uptrend ever since (although the chart covers only 2003).

By BLS statistics, in May 2003, the number of unemployed workers was 8.96 million and we had a jobless rate of 6.1 percent. In May of 2004 the BLS reports the number of unemployed at 8.2 million and the jobless rate at 5.6. We know that the unemployment rate hovered near 5.6 percent since December 2003 (six months including May, or half of the total period),

In summary, it looks like this:

P1 (5/03 to 5/04): 800,000 new jobs;
Unemployment drops from 6.1% to 5.6%

P2 (1/04 to 5/04): 1,200,000 new jobs;
Unemployment stays the same!

Keep in mind that P2 is only the latter half of P1, not a separate time period.

We are told that today we have supposedly 1.2 million fewer jobless people than we had in January this year - so the jobless rate certainly should have declined, shouldn't it?

A smaller decrease in jobless workers between May last year and this year was less than a million (about 800,000) and that caused the unemployment rate to drop from 6.1 to 5.6 percent during the year. But yet, we are told that a 50% higher gain in jobs (1.2 million) during a shorter period (the latter half of the year) resulted in absolutely no change in the unemployment rate, whatsoever???

Let's allow for the fact that, theoretically speaking, there could have been an increase in the working population during P2 (the latter half of P1) that wiped out the percentage reduction in unemployment the 1.2 million additional jobs normally would have wrought.

But if that was true, then in order for P1 (the full year) to have witnessed such a reduction in the unemployment rate (from 6.1 to 5.6 percent) there must have been tremendous losses in the working-age population during the first half of P1.

Did the working-age population of the US shrink that much between May 2003 and December 2003? Highly unlikely. If there are such figures, I'd like to see them.

There reportedly are 8.2 million unemployed persons (have no job but were looking for one in the past 4 months) today. Since we supposedly gained 1.2 million jobs this year, as of January 1, 2004, there must have been 9.4 million unemployed. That's more unemployed than there were in May of 2003 (8.96 million). But we know that since December 2003, the unemployment rate remained at or near 5.6 percent.

So, we are asked to believe then that the unemployment rate (the percentage rate) dropped from 6.1 percent to 5.6 percent during a time while the total number of unemployed actually increased? How does that work?

Uhh ... excuse me, Mr. BLS economist: those numbers just don't add up!

We are given no explanation. Reporters don't report about this. Analysts don't analyze it. All manner of government and media types just shut up - and leave you hanging there, believing in a "Bush recovery" - just in time for an important election. How conveeeeeenient!

What's the effect of these lies on the price of gold?

Well, considering that the price of gold - since determined at an almost purely paper-based exchange - itself is a lie, technically speaking the effect is not big. But psychologically, of course, many a hedge fund manager will feel a lot of pressure to sell gold when he thinks he "realizes" the resulting upward pressure on US interest rates and therefore the dollar from the "stellar economic performance." (Maybe those who read this who are hedge-fund investors should send their fund manager a copy of this article!)

Lies upon lies, to achieve nothing but a psychological effect - on a false presumption. That's the current state of the world's financial markets. No wonder gold investors - seeking to invest in truth - get discouraged sometimes. But the trend is your friend, now. Even the lies only serve to dampen the irrepressible upward momentum - and that only for a time.

Keep hanging on to your gold - lest you play into the hands of those who want to buy it from you - dirt cheap!

Got gold?


gold-eagle.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (48901)6/13/2004 8:41:30 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Chain of Events

Don Stott

I live 65 miles from one of the most exclusive mountain resorts in America, and that is Telluride. Telluride, where the rich and famous build multi-million dollar homes with spectacular views, and sometimes occupy them for a mere two or three weeks a year. Telluride, where the bloom was never going to fade, and where extreme prosperity was going to live forever. Prices continually going up, was gospel. Twenty five foot lots going for over a hundred thousand dollars, and no expense spared, the norm. Well, it's depressionville in Telluride, as well as Aspen, and Vail, two other swank Colorado towns, where the money flows like wateràor did anyway.

When the stock of a rich CEO or nabob goes from $95 to $2, they have to pull in, and have done so. Some sudden wealth has evaporated like a drop of water on a sun-baked sidewalk in July. Some builders, who built elaborate "spec" homes, just waiting for the next buyer to arrive, are stuck with them, and are, in many cases, going bankrupt, with the holder of the paper re-possessing them. Real estate brokers are offering their services for 2% in some cases, hoping to close a deal. Building permits are way down, and prices of extant homes are being cut right and leftàto get rid of them. No, they still aren't bargains, but they are a lot cheaper than before, and going down.

Why do I mention this? Because this has fostered a chain reaction, which is very much evident, not only on Telluride, Steamboat Springs, Aspen, and Vail, but surrounding towns, where the servants and tradesmen live. There used to be a traffic jam on Keystone Hill, leaving Telluride about 4:30PM daily, as the electricians, plumbers, roofers, and carpenters left for home, after a long day of building. No more. Many have been laid off, because few are building. Realtors have laid off sales people, and restaurants have laid off waiters, cooks, and dish washers. Shops are having sales, and the lack of healthy economic activity, has affected everyone in the chain. Laid off employees, contractors, and tradesmen, in some cases, are having extreme difficulty meeting payments, and are conserving their dollars to do so. In other words, the laid off aren't buying any more than is absolutely necessary for survival.

Gas stations are suffering, because of the lack of round trips of tradesmen, and service personnel. New car sales have slumped, as have sales of building materials, paint, dry wall, insulation, pipe, wire, roofing, and all other building materials. Lumber companies, wholesale electrical, and plumbing suppliers, have laid off clerks and deliverymen. A chain of events has affected every single person involved in these posh towns, and in all surrounding towns. Why mention this? Easy. Because the chain of events, which began in ritzy communities, will surely spread to other communities, as it already has, and this could be the beginning of a real estate downturn in all locations. Telluride, Aspen, Steamboat and Vail are still rich and prosperous, but not nearly as much so. Building is still being done, but at a fraction of the levels of a couple of years ago. The summer festivals still draw crowds, and to the casual visitor, all seems well and prosperous. But the former huge prosperityàis absent.

If the tradesmen can't find a job to replace the ones lost, they might have to sell their residence at a sacrifice, and move to greener fields. If construction slows in other places, manufacturers of building materials will have to lay off, as will distributors, drivers, sales people, and every single employee involved, as well as suppliers to those entities. While building is still going on in my town, in rust belt cities, this is often not true. In my town, real estate, according to my friends who do it for a living, has "leveled off." A three bedroom, four year old home belonging to a friend, with two car garage, and listed for $156,500 has only been shown once in the last two weeks. Most rust belt cities, have already had this chain of events happen to them. Ohio has lost a quarter million jobs in less than four years. The real estate boom has been kept alive by low interest rates, and the foolish American habit of going into debt, and living beyond, or at incomes. As long as the payments can be made, Americans like to live at the limit. When jobs disappear, payments cannot be made, and economy measures are taken to survive. This means that buying slows, and it is buying, which keeps an economy afloat. If buying slows, or in some places stops, the chain reaction is felt everywhere.

Auto manufacturers, a few years ago, decided that zero percent financing would increase sales, and indeed it did. Car sales zoomed to the heavens, due to it. No more, as the new car demand has been saturated. The zero percent financing still continues, but sales are sluggish, and auto manufacturers and sales forces have laid off employees, with the same chain reaction as has happened in Telluride and others. Low, low mortgage rates have kept the housing boom going. Not only in re-financing, but building new, and purchasing old homes. Will the fed raise interest rates? It is said they not only will, but must, in order to keep foreigners purchasing US debt. If they do, will that knock real estate? It seems to me, that the fed is between a rock and a hard place.

In 1929, when the market crashed, there was no $7 trillion in consumer debt, nor an even higher federal debt. There was no Social Security, with promises to pay of many trillions, with not a dime in the till. There were no credit cards in 1929. As in 1929, huge percentages of Americans own and owned stocks then. When they were wiped out, the chain of events I now speak of began, just as it has now. The rich were the ones wiped out first, and their spacious luxurious homes went on the market, and found no buyers. These posh homes still exist in the poorer neighborhoods of major cities, and have been converted into apartments in most cases, as the neighborhoods went down. By 1932, the depression had been felt by every single American, with an official unemployment rate of 25%, but probably much higher.

When bubbles burst, the results are felt far and wide. Many stock market experts say that the current resurgence in the market is but temporary, because profits are low or non-extant, and P/E ratios are far too high. Richard Russell, the most expert of all, is not optimistic, and I can't blame him. He says buy gold.

Locally, where I live, the Louisiana Pacific strand board plant, of which I wrote 150 or so columns ago, has never re-opened, and lots of tradesmen, who used to commute to Telluride daily, are looking for work. The chain reaction from a super rich community's slowing noticeably, has been felt here, and I imagine will pervade the rest of this land, as months pass. It is said that 150,000 new jobs per month must be created for the US economy to live. Such is not even close to happening, other than as illustrated with fake government figures. How many of them were government? Tens of thousands of jobs have been "created," to examine your baggage and shoes as you attempt to fly. Can this historic chain of events be stopped? Real estate prices in West Denver have declined, and these are fine neighborhoods. Not like Telluride of course, but a decline has begun. Today, there are second mortgages by the millions; and millions of homes are financed, not only to their current value, but in many cases, far above. Is real estate a bubble? The last bubble before disaster sets in? The Durango-Silverton narrow gauge railroad, cut its trains from four to two this past season. The average home price in Durango Colorado, is over $400,000, and is a huge bubble, I am afraid.

Small towns will survive the longest, due to their lack of minority populations, lower crime, danger of terrorism, and generally a more pleasant life style. What will happen to big cities, if a terrorist strike occurs in one of them? Will the exodus increase, as it already has, to a much larger scale? Could this be a reason for large city real estate to go down in price, because of people wanting to get out of them? Prices don't seem to have gone down in warm climes. Locally, 10 families a month are moving into my town, and the school population went down 50 last year. Are retirees, and people who can make a living out of big cities, moving out to pleasanter places? Has the chain of events as occurred in Telluride, begun in big cities?

Don't expect truth or help from Uncle Sam, if things go bad or get worse. Uncle Sam caused the 1929 debacle, and never did get us out of it, till WWII began, some say as a deliberate "cure" for the seeming incurable depression. As the markets attempted to recover from the 1929 crash and 1932 bottom, Uncle Sam and the Federal Reserve, did exactly what shouldn't have been done, and prolonged it.

To quote George Bernard Shaw, "You have a choice between the natural stability of gold, and the honesty and intelligence of the members of government. And with all due respect for those gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the capitalist system lasts, vote for gold." Protect yourself.


gold-eagle.com