SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Mish's Global Economic Trend Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: yard_man who wrote (7850)6/11/2004 9:02:24 PM
From: dpl  Respond to of 116555
 
" On what basis do you compare that cycle to the prior cycles and conclude it was a mini-bubble -- is it because the S&Ls had to be bailed out a little while later"

Yes.The S&L problem was from a "mini" bubble in commercial RE.The recession that followed officially ended in 1991 but the Fed had to keep rates at a 30 year low until 1994.The stocks bubble kicked in in 1995.

"1) preventing the bust of the real estate bubble"

I think that is the main thing on the Fed's mind.They are doing everything they can to prevent it even telling people to get adj mortgages.<g>

"2) preventing its demise from sending us into recession /
depression"

I believe that deflation is like stepping off a cliff.If you take one step too much then nothing can stop the results.

"Shortly before the nazcarp bust, I received a couple of lump sums -- one was from my grandfathers estate and another was a gift from my in-laws -- I applied the sum from my grandfathers estate toward my mortgage and the amount from my in-laws to pay off a note on my truck -- I remember telling one of our PhD consultants this -- and look he looked at me very strange and said -- "You know, they say you shouldn't do that ..." Intimating that better returns could be had by investing the money -- I was, at the time, applying these amounts to loans having 6% and 7% rate -- I viewed as an instant return -- elimination of future interest payments. He thought I was nuts. "

Back in 1983 my father-in-law thought I was nuts when I told him that some day I would have a mortgage lower than his 6.75%.It's 5.75% <G>

I am a great believer in long term inflation\deflation cycles and they said to me that 1980 was the long term inflation high.

Good trading..David