Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mcg404 who wrote (21173)	6/12/2004 10:44:32 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 80934

John > he's right on target when he gets into the problem and ramifications of corporatism Yes, that's the problem, all right. The American people are being devoured by the Frankenstein which they, themselves, made. Not that had much choice in the matter, mind you! As an outsider, I have an idea that Ralph will pick up quite a few votes in the forthcoming election, particularly from those who are disaffected by W & Co and who can't bring themselves round to vote for Kerry. Such a thing happened in the UK now, in the regional elections, where Labour was strongly defeated but the principal opposition party, the Conservatives, did not pick up more than 60% of the "swing vote". The remainder went to small parties who were never even considered to be in the running.

To: mcg404 who wrote (21173)	6/13/2004 6:55:41 PM
From: sea_urchin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 80934

John, here's another piece which I think will meet your approval. truthout.org >> The United States faces a real crisis. It's not just the military failure of Bush's policies in Iraq or the discrediting of our armed forces and intelligence agencies as corrupt, incompetent, and criminal. It is above all our international isolation and disgrace because of our contempt for the rule of law. Article six of the U. S. Constitution says, in part, "all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land." The Geneva Conventions of 1949 covering the treatment of prisoners of war and civilians in wartime are treaties the U.S. government promoted, signed, and ratified. They are therefore the supreme law of the land. Neither the President nor the Secretary of Defense has the authority to alter them or to choose whether or not to abide by them. President Bush's invention of such hitherto unknown categories as "illegal combatant," "evil-doer," or "bad guy" and his claim of a unilateral right to imprison such persons indefinitely, without charging them or giving them access to the courts and legal counsel, is a usurpation of the Constitution. It is precisely why the United States should have ratified the treaty establishing the International Criminal Court. It is intended to deal not only with genuine terrorists and people like Saddam Hussein but also with the kind of crimes President Bush has committed. ...let me nonetheless end by noting that the political system may not be capable of saving the Republic. It is hard to imagine that any president of either party could stand up to the powerful vested interests surrounding the Pentagon and the secret intelligence agencies. Given that 40% of the defense budget is secret and that all of the intelligence agencies' budgets are secret, it is impossible for Congress to do effective oversight of them even if it wanted to. This is not something that started with the Bush administration.<< It's amazing how powerful the "secret" government is. As a non-American, it is beginning to appear to me that the US is, in fact, two completely different countries. Maybe that's how others see it too?