Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: elmatador who wrote (50913)	6/13/2004 8:59:06 AM
From: RealMuLan	Respond to of 74559

it does sound like non-sense to me<g>

To: elmatador who wrote (50913)	6/13/2004 12:51:59 PM
From: energyplay	Respond to of 74559

El Matador - You're right this is nonsense "the world is a much more unequal place than 40 years ago" Biggest population in "undeveloped" countries 40 years ago - China India Indonesia Brazil Pakistan that should be about 60-70 % of the undevloped world population. Indonesia has been having a tougher time with oil running out, currency hit in 1997 Asia crisis, tourism down because of Bali bombings. All the other countries are doing much better to wildly better. **** Let's make sure ot exclude from the list - South Korea Malaysia Thailand Peru Ecaudor Algeria etc. So what is worse ? mainly African states - Congo / Zaire Ugands Angola Nigeria Ivory Coast Malawi Mozambique Rawanda and worst of all Zimbabwe Most of these have wars, rebelions, mass killings, extensive criminal activity, kleptocratic governments, etc. This isn't the world, and the world shouldn't donnate money to these places so their elite crooks can have Swiss bank accounts, send their kids abroad for education and drive Mercedes. These countries neede supervison, and possible re-colonialization, not big checks. S Since Europe hasn't dome well, how about India and China giving it a go ? Doesn't China need an African empire ?