Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mr. Palau who wrote (582671)	6/13/2004 5:56:26 PM
From: Srexley	Respond to of 769670

"If not, which one was it?" There was none. The FL SC changed the rules at least three times to allow it. Finally the US SC had to put a stop to their madness. The 1st ruling by the FL SC was mandated 9 to NOTHTING. The next ruling involving the new rules for counting that the made up was shot down by the US SC by 7 to 2. A manual recount would have been legal per Florida law if there was machine malfuncition, which there was not or if there was fraud, which there was not. All reasons for the hand recount were shut down soundly in Florida's lower courts only to be be thrown out WITHOUT REVIEW by the FL SC. The ruling that resulted in illegal counting procedures reulted in a response from the Chief FL SC justice with warnings of a breakdown in the system. There was no law on the books that would allow Gore to hand pick the 4 counties he did, and the partisan FL SC had to be stopped before THEY TOOK AWAY Bush's victory.