Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (582827)	6/14/2004 10:45:03 AM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

Those are AMERICAN soldiers, and thus you cannot accurately describe them as "OURS". You should describe them to the rest of us in the future as "yours"...

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (582827)	6/14/2004 12:06:37 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 769670

Sad that the headline didn't mention that one of our soldiers died. I'm afraid its becoming all too commonplace. Besides, thirteen sounds a lot more dramatic than one.

To: gerard mangiardi who wrote (582827)	6/14/2004 3:04:04 PM
From: XBrit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

<<Sad that the headline didn't mention that one of our soldiers died.>> You mean its really not right to lump a brave American in with the worthless untermenschen, right? I suspect the media are beginning to feel that there is a degree of racism in emphasizing American dead over innocent Iraqi and other nations dead. I certainly think so. Since you're making a relative value judgement, can you put a number to it? Is 1 dead American more important than 100 dead Iraqis? A million?