SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Doren who wrote (583085)6/15/2004 12:25:04 AM
From: Srexley  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
"Let's see Bush outs a CIA agent"

This is a good example of a leftie spokesman. What proof do you have that Bush did this? None is the answer. But the haters need no proof.

"Clinton got a blow job, resulting in pleasurable feelings and later embarassment."

He trashed a young women emotionally who was in love with him so he could get his rocks off while he was married. And then he lied to a judge about it during an ongoing sexual harrasment case that he presumable was guilty of since he paid her $800,000. That's called perjury, and there is proof of his guilt. He has also since been disbarred from Arkansas and ever arguing in front of the U.S.S.C, so presumable the perjury charge is legit too.

Your charge has no basis in fact at all. This kind of dishonest "debating" is probably what drives guys like cybeken nuts. You are either really, really stupid, or incredibly dishonest. It's ok if you condone Clinton's behavior and think it is appropriate for a sitting President to treat his interns that way and then lie to a judge about it to avoid guilt in an ongoing sexual harrasment case, but to lay blame on Bush with no proof is EVTREMELY classless, and dishonest. And un-American.