SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: crustyoldprospector who wrote (15268)6/15/2004 7:24:57 AM
From: orkrious  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
crusty, try that link again



To: crustyoldprospector who wrote (15268)6/15/2004 9:53:38 AM
From: Jim Willie CB  Respond to of 110194
 
yes, but Chinese bankers are far more prudent than USA

this line is strange:
Mr Niwa said China’s mix of capitalism and socialism would be extremely hard to model. He added: “Even Greenspan doesn’t have 100 per cent confidence over running the US economy and he is the expert. What chance do the Chinese have when there is no experience to show the way?”

since when is Greenspasm expert at anything but building and killing bubbles, distorting on what inflation is, misleading the public on economic myths, and catering to the Ruling Elite (who staff the financial engg machinery) ???

China effectively increases its bank reserve ratio reqmts
they prudently issue credit extension warnings
they properly pull back on smelter energy users
their leaders are not beholden to special interests
they have no elections to concern themselves with

I think China has plenty of speed bumps to deal with
but since when is America the example of anything but debt explosion, monetary stupidity, inflation export, and broken bubbles ???

/ jim



To: crustyoldprospector who wrote (15268)6/15/2004 10:23:31 AM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 110194
 
Sounds good for commodities.



To: crustyoldprospector who wrote (15268)6/15/2004 1:36:51 PM
From: NOW  Respond to of 110194
 
aside from his idiotic reference to AG, hmm maybe the guy is an idiot.