SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Residential Real Estate Crash Index -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim McMannis who wrote (21679)6/15/2004 4:54:32 PM
From: George8Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Why not? All statistics keep saying 20% (I'm saying the recent data on L.A. and Orange County) increase in a quarter.



To: Jim McMannis who wrote (21679)6/16/2004 4:26:39 AM
From: Amy JRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 306849
 
Jim, RE: "As for the under 30 crowd...at some point they will have to throw their hands up. "

Demographically speaking they seem more conservative and will probably just move back in with their Mom & Dad. (When I moved to Silicon Valley, I was really surprised at the large number of 20+year olds that live with their parents. Especially common with Asian famlies.)

Used to be the norm in this country.

One way to reduce the Baby Boomer Soc Sec problem is by having the 20-set take care of their baby boomer parents. By lowering interest rates a lot so housing prices drastically increase out of reach for the 20-set, this could help create a financial motivation for the 20-set to take care of their baby boomer parents in exchange for a place to live. Otherwise, there's always 50-year mortgages they could get.

On a different note, the crime rate hasn't increased as much as one might normally expect for a severe downturn - possibly due to the ability to refinance out of a bad spell? What I'm wondering is, what happens when all refinancing opportunites have been exhausted? Will crime shoot up?

Regards,
Amy J