Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (104)	6/15/2004 9:16:00 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4965

I have no idea why people think things would have been any different. I believe it is partisanship. Irregardless, it is a mute point, since Kerry was not President, but we do know that he did little with the Logan warning...that is why I believe the results would have been the same. tonto, why would anyone perceive that Kerry could prevent another 9/11 better than Bush? In a recent poll, Kerry did receive slightly higher percentage than Bush, EXCEPT when asked the homeland security question. Those polled overwhelmingly chose Bush for that category.