Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (178297)	6/15/2004 8:01:50 PM
From: Elmer Phud	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Lizzie - This is a good thing and I think that when shareholders calm down they'll realize that there isn't any measurable expense to expense. The WCOM/Enron backlash has people on a witch hunt and overreacting in the extreme.

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (178297)	6/15/2004 9:29:02 PM
From: rkral	Respond to of 186894

Lizzie, re "not new news but ..." Why not new news? According to the story, it just happened today. Ron

To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (178297)	6/16/2004 11:19:24 AM
From: hueyone	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Yeah, we are going to compromise by reporting some of our stock option expense to the investing public rather than reporting none of our stock option expense to the investing public. What a stupid bill!!! Stock options are an expense if granted to the top 5 officers of a corporation, but they are not an expense if granted to the rank and file? Please!!!!! Stock options are either a legitimate expense or they are not, and imo they are a legitimate expense. JMO, Huey