To: HairBall who wrote (1861 ) 6/16/2004 8:47:50 AM From: LPS5 Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3432 Leach [sic] off you, what a f'ing buffoon. There go those emotions again. Unsurprisingly. The word is leech , incidentally. And here's an example of a recent, pathetic attempt at doing so:Message 20204480 I guess I could say that I'm sorry not to be more helpful, but instead I'll offer this: choke on it. I'm not interested in subsidizing your learning curve or directing even a few crumbs in your direction.You have NEVER posting anything on SI regarding the markets. I "have [never] posting"...? LOL. But, even despite your dementedly-phrased claim, of course I do...Message 20195086 Message 20168359 Message 20167970 ...what apparently frustrates you is that it's nothing you can utilize for your loose, plunking efforts.The only deluded individual in this exchange is you. Hmmm. You're a purveyor of comfortably unfalsifiable retail pseudoscience - drawing lines on top of other lines to predict what the market is going to do - and conspiracy theories. So how am I 'deluded'? :-)Your contributions to SI are conflict... Is your beef that I "contribut[e...]conflict," or could it be that you encapsulate an unholy union of low intelligence and haughty ego; a combination that ultimately leaves you utterly unable to deal with the unpopular...and, yes, at times unflattering...opinions and depictions I express? ...and holier than thou buffoonery. Like this attempt you made to mock someone's spelling, calling them "dumb"...Message 20075191 ...considering this determined foray into literary idiocy you made on that very same day ?Message 20076863 Does your mental health care nurse know you are loose on the internet? Nutcase, find someone else to stalk... Speaking of "stalk[ing]", where's ibg ?Message 15233298 Message 15233491 Message 15445285 LPS5