SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (49208)6/16/2004 8:34:14 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Reagan era nothing to be proud of

June 15, 2004

BY JESSE JACKSON




Last week we paid respect to Ronald Reagan, saluting his optimism, his ability to communicate and his grandfatherly affability. But Reagan was an ideological politician. He championed ideas that helped forge a conservative era. Reagan was largely on the wrong side of history and his era is exhausted, his ideas part of our problem, not part of our solution.

Consider that if Reagan was right, then Martin Luther King Jr. was wrong. Reagan called King a communist. He wanted to gut the Voting Rights Act and the civil rights laws. He pushed to give tax breaks to colleges that practiced racial discrimination. He praised apartheid South Africa as a bastion of democracy and thought Nelson Mandela should stay in jail.

Behind that smile, Reagan practiced a vicious brand of race-bait politics. He opened his 1980 campaign in Philadelphia, Miss., calling for a revival of states' rights. Now, he had to work to get to Philadelphia. It isn't an airplane hub. And it is known for only one thing: It is the town where three civil rights workers were brutally murdered during the 1960s.

Reagan went there to send a message to whites (and to blacks) across the South. Then he slurred the invented ''welfare queen,'' suggesting that poor African-American women were living high on the dole. He turned the war on poverty to the war on the poor, slashing housing subsidies by 80 percent and creating a dramatic rise of homelessness in this country.

But Reagan was wrong. King had it right. This country's diversity is its strength. Congress spurned Reagan's efforts to overturn the civil rights laws. Over Reagan's veto, Congress imposed sanctions on South Africa. Mandela remains Africa's leading statesman. Reagan's race-bait politics did help Republicans consolidate their position in the South as the party of white sanctuary.

Reagan championed tax cuts for the rich, corporate free trade and deregulation and privatization. But tax cuts led to deficits as far as the eye could see, and even Reagan began the process of raising taxes to pay for them. But he raised taxes on working and middle-income people, forcing them to pay for the party that he threw for the rich. Corporate trade provided incentives for companies to move jobs abroad and put American workers in direct competition with slave labor abroad.

The result was the beginning of record trade deficits, and turning the United States from the world's largest creditor to its largest debtor. Increasingly, our children will have to pay off creditors in China, Japan and elsewhere, taxing their own income. Reagan left us more indebted, more unequal and more crime-ridden than before.

And, of course, Reagan was the champion of big-stick foreign policy and scorn for international institutions. Under Reagan, preemptive covert wars led directly to the debacle in Central America and the scandals at home that are known as Iran-contra, where Reagan, unable to win support for the covert war in the court of public opinion, decided to trash the law and the Constitution to pursue his wars.

Reagan doubled the military budget in peacetime, wasting literally hundreds of billions on weapons systems that we did not need and never used. He -- and the CIA -- thought the Soviet Union was strong and on the march, when in fact it was rotting from within. Unlike the neoconservatives who now dominate the Bush administration, Reagan at least realized that Gorbachev was for real and negotiated with him.

And now, Bush's big-stick foreign policy and scorn for international institutions have left America more isolated, more mistrusted and less influential across the world than ever. Those policies are making America less secure and more vulnerable. And costing us thousands of casualties and over $200 billion in the deserts of Iraq.

We can admire Reagan's mastery of his performance and remember his sense of good humor. But we should not ignore the failure of the ideas he championed. And we should celebrate the passing of the era he helped to create.

suntimes.com



To: Wharf Rat who wrote (49208)6/16/2004 1:29:43 PM
From: Skywatcher  Respond to of 89467
 
Ex-Soldier Recalls Beating He Received in Guantanamo Drill

By David Zucchino, Times Staff Writer

GEORGETOWN, Ky. — Shortly after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, Sean Baker reenlisted in the Kentucky National Guard. He considered himself a patriot, he says, and felt a strong call to serve his country.

Baker, 37, a Persian Gulf War veteran, was disappointed when his unit wasn't activated. So he volunteered for another Kentucky National Guard unit assigned to the U.S. military prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, where as a military policeman he guarded detainees accused of being Talibs and Al Qaeda members.

There, early on the morning of Jan. 24, 2003, Spc. Baker says, he was choked and beaten by fellow MPs on the steel floor of a 6-by-8 prison cell during a botched training exercise. Since then, he claims, the military has abandoned him.

Baker says he volunteered to put on an orange prison jumpsuit and portray an uncooperative detainee in a training drill. But the five-man MP "immediate response force" sent in to extract him was not told of the exercise. According to Baker's lawyer, the soldiers were told that Baker was an unruly detainee who had been doused with pepper spray after assaulting a sergeant.

Four MPs slammed Baker to the floor, he says, then choked him and pounded his head at least three times against the floor. Gasping for breath, he managed to spit out a code word — "red" — and to croak: "I'm a U.S. soldier! I'm a U.S. soldier!"

But the beating continued, according to Baker, until the jumpsuit was yanked down in the struggle, revealing his military uniform. Only then did the MPs realize that they had been beating an American soldier — causing a traumatic brain injury, Baker alleges.

"What happened to me is something that should never have happened to any American soldier," Baker wrote in an e-mail response to questions from the Los Angeles Times. "I pray it will never happen again."


Honorably discharged with a medical retirement in April, Baker spends dreary days inside a nondescript duplex in central Kentucky, unable to work because of what he says are seizures caused by the beating. He is taking nine prescription medications for seizures and headaches, his lawyer said. He has yet to receive disability payments promised by the military.

"The way the military treated Sean is unconscionable — and the way they continue to treat him is even worse," said attorney Bruce Simpson.


The military at first said Baker's medical discharge was not related to the beating at Guantanamo. Last week, the military reversed itself, saying the incident was partly responsible for his discharge.

Lt. Col. Jim Marshall, a spokesman for the U.S. Southern Command, said that an internal investigation in February 2003 concluded that no one was liable for Baker's injuries and there was no need for a criminal inquiry. Another spokeswoman, Maj. Laurie Arellano, said the investigation concluded that Baker's injuries were a "foreseeable consequence" of the drill.

NO ONE IN THIS ARMY OR ADMINISTRATION WILL EVER ADMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANYTHING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Marshall said procedures had been reviewed to prevent future injuries. "While it is unfortunate that Spc. Baker was injured, the standards of professionalism we expect of our soldiers mandate that our training be as a realistic as possible," he said.

Members of immediate response forces are "handpicked based on maturity, common sense and judgment," Marshall said, adding that they were trained to use the minimum force necessary.

According to Simpson, the military has suggested that Baker was beaten because he resisted attempts to extract him. Simpson said Baker simply followed orders to pose as an uncooperative detainee.

"They're blaming him for resisting, as if it was his fault for provoking a beating," he said.

Simpson said the Pentagon had not responded to his requests for Baker's military and medical records. But after the lawyer and Rep. Ben Chandler (D-Ky.) complained about Baker not receiving disability payments, they were told by the military Monday that he qualified for 100% disability and would receive his first check within 10 days.

Baker said someone should be held responsible.

"I never thought my military career would end as a result of a beating which I sustained at the hands of my fellow troops," he wrote. "Someone in charge should have known better."

Simpson said Baker and other National Guard MPs at Guantanamo were summoned from their posts at 2 a.m. and asked to volunteer for a training exercise involving MPs from the 303rd Military Police Company of Michigan. Baker assumed it was another "quarter time" walk-through drill, in which soldiers had previously acted out the roles of detainees while wearing U.S. military uniforms.


But this was the first time Baker had heard of soldiers being asked to wear a prison jumpsuit. Even so, when no one volunteered, he raised his hand.

The officer in charge "actually ordered me to put on the uniform of my enemy," Baker told WLEX-TV of Lexington, Ky., which first reported his allegations. "I was reluctant, but he said: 'You'll be fine. Put this on.' So I did."

Baker, who is 6 feet, 1 inch tall and weighs about 225 pounds, said he was ordered to crawl under a prison bunk and refuse to come out. He said he assumed that the MPs taking part knew it was a drill.

When the response force rushed into the cell, Baker said, the MPs dragged him out, slammed him face down, pinned his arms, twisted his legs behind his back and locked him in a painful chokehold.

"One of the individuals got up on my back and put pressure on me," Baker said. "I could not breathe, and I began to panic a little bit."

The soldier slammed his head against the steel floor while choking him, Baker said. A translator shouted at Baker in Pashto, an Afghan language, apparently believing he was a Taliban detainee, Simpson said.

In addition to the alleged brain injuries, Simpson said, Baker was cut on his temple and was treated at the prison.

A military physical evaluation board report of an examination Baker underwent in September 2003 cited his "service-connected disability" and said that Baker's "TBI was due to soldier playing role of detainee who was noncooperative and was being extracted from detention cell in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, during a training exercise."

Baker was treated at four military hospitals, including a 48-day stay at Walter Reed Army Medical Center, before his discharge. Arellano, the military spokeswoman, said in late May that the Walter Reed treatment was unrelated to Baker's prison injuries. But the military since has conceded that Baker's hospitalization was for those injuries, spokesman Marshall said.

According to Simpson — who said he had obtained portions of the military's internal investigation — the MPs reported that they had been told Baker was a troublesome detainee who had assaulted a sergeant and refused to leave his cell.

Two of the MPs reportedly told investigators that before the incident, they gave a videotaped description of their mission to a team member, who taped the exercise. A sergeant in Baker's unit, the 438th Military Police Company, attempted to retrieve the tape but was told it had been lost or misplaced, Simpson said.

Marshall said response teams were aware that their actions typically were taped, with the video reviewed to ensure that minimum force was applied to detainees. However, a military spokesman at Guantanamo said that because only actions against actual detainees — not exercises — were taped, it was not likely that a video existed of the drill involving Baker.

While Baker was being treated at the hospital at Guantanamo, Simpson said, he was visited by Maj. Gen. Geoffrey Miller, the prison commander at the time. He said Miller promised that those responsible for Baker's beating would be dealt with under military law.
MILLER APPEARS AGAIN AND AGAIN IN ALL THESE HOT SPOTS!!!!!

Simpson said he was contacted last week by Criminal Investigation Division investigators from Ft. Knox, Ky., who said they were told to interview Baker and investigate the incident because of recent media coverage. The agents planned to interview Baker today, Simpson said.

Since Baker's discharge, his family — wife Renee and 14-year-old son Sean Jr. — has been living on Renee's income as a restaurant hostess. He did not go public with his allegations until he was contacted last month by the Kentucky TV station.

After the TV segment, Simpson has not allowed Baker to be interviewed. Baker did respond via e-mail.

"Sean is not a whiner or a complainer," Simpson said. "He hasn't demanded that I sue somebody. All he wants is help getting his disability checks."

After Baker's case became public, the local sheriff said that Baker had been forced to resign as a part-time Scott County sheriff's deputy in 1992 following a series of incidents that included unprofessional actions in a traffic accident.

"I do not enjoy talking about what happened to me at Guantanamo Bay," Baker wrote in his e-mail. "In my heart, I still consider myself a soldier. I am honored to have served my country."