Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MrLucky who wrote (50540)	6/16/2004 12:24:11 PM
From: carranza2	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793790

Hillary, of course. It's such an obvious thing, to me anyway. She's a good campaigner, has a good Senate record on defense and security, will have Bill working hard in the ticket's behalf, allows her to run either at the end of Kerry's possible two-term presidency or after Kerry gets defeated by a GOP candidate,and it really doesn't affect her negatively for the future if the Kerry/Hillary ticket loses. There is no downside to either and a lot of upside to both.

To: MrLucky who wrote (50540)	6/16/2004 2:17:49 PM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 793790

"Charlie Rose" had MARK HALPERIN, Political Director, ABC News, THOMAS OLIPHANT, The Boston Globe, and DAVID F. HALBFINGER, The New York Times on last night. They were in agreement that Edwards has staked out one hell of a claim to VP, and that there was a Democratic consensus for him. He has been speaking and fundraising for Kerry around the country.