Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tonto who wrote (231)	6/17/2004 8:31:52 AM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4965

Does Chinu believe that he may lie but it is not acceptable for others? He has some life decisions to make. The WH is no different than Chinu. To:CalculatedRisk who wrote (31196) From: ChinuSFO Thursday, Jun 17, 2004 8:18 AM Respond to of 31200 The 9/11 Commission's report proves that Paul O/neill was truthful in his book, that Dick Clarke and Bob Woodward were also not lying as the White House would have us believe. Instead it was the White House lying about the entire thing. Bush did have an obsession with Iraq from the day he took office.

To: tonto who wrote (231)	6/17/2004 6:09:23 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4965

"Chinu was exposed as a liar," And he lied about Bush saying the war on terror has been won. When I questioned him on that, I got kicked off the thread.

To: tonto who wrote (231)	6/17/2004 6:23:34 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4965

"AS says he is against bsing so he has put someone on ignore...yet he does not place the admitted bser Chinu on ignore" I confronted him with the same lie from chinu that got me kicked off and asked if he thought it was true. His response was that "Maybe you (me) are the liar". Then he told me not to post to him anymore. A few choice explitives later, and I was done posting with him too. If I was a dem, I would lambast these guys and disassociate myself with them. But most do not. If the party does not get hurt by them and the U.S. accepts this type of behavior by rewarding it, then the U.S. is in trouble imo.