SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Don't Blame Me, I Voted For Kerry -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: ChinuSFO who wrote (31331)6/18/2004 10:33:01 AM
From: longnshortRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Nader to be excluded from the Presidential debates, I guess the democrats really don't want all voices and all votes counted



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (31331)6/18/2004 10:36:21 AM
From: Glenn PetersenRead Replies (2) | Respond to of 81568
 
The history of third party candidates is that their support always tails off. Ultimately, most people want their votes to count for something. I'm sure that if we went back and looked at 2000, the final numbers for Nader and Buchanan were half of what they had been two or three months prior to the election.

There is one additional danger for Kerry, however. If public perceptions related to Iraq do not improve, and Kerry is viewed as a "me too" candidate on the issue, the anti-war vote will increase. Nader benefits at Kerry's expense.



To: ChinuSFO who wrote (31331)6/18/2004 12:27:27 PM
From: American SpiritRead Replies (1) | Respond to of 81568
 
Nader will fall because he has nothing to offer, helped put Bush in power, is dishonest (telling us both parties are the same) and can only help Bush in 2004. Bushies will probably help fund his campaign secretly.