To: SilentZ who wrote (190819 ) 6/18/2004 1:39:48 PM From: i-node Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1573215 BS. Lewinsky did what she did because she wanted to do it. If Clinton had been single, I'd see NOTHING wrong with what he did -- not even a little wrong. You are totally confused on this subject. The concept of "consensual sex" cannot exist between a near-teenager and the most powerful man in the world. While I'll agree there are some 20 year-olds who can handle it, on a basic ethical level Clinton had a total responsibility to avoid the situation. Altogether. And now, even he has admitted it (sort of). Was Lewinsky influenced by Clinton's power? I don't know. But there is certainly an indiputable appearance that she was. Unfortunately, as a kid in her early 20s she simply didn't have the experience to be engaged in any kind of relationship with Clinton. It wasn't HER fault. The responsiblity is TOTALLY on Clinton. This is not to say Lewinsky couldn't have a consensual relationship with a DIFFERENT 50 year old; she could. The thing that makes it ethically and morally corrupt is his power. This is tantamount to some kind of sexual assault IMO. Although, I don't believe Clinton should be criminally responsible for it, since it is unprovable. (The Juanita Broaderrick rape clearly happened, and I'm very sorry she didn't put him out of commission at the time).Power comes with responsibility. Clinton obviously abused his power (he has said this much) with regard to Lewinsky. The question of whether it ought to be a crime, well, that's a different question. The world is full of criminals who obtain power and use it inappropriately. That, in fact, is what a criminal does -- whether it is a rapist, a murderer, bankrobber, or dope dealer. It is all about abusing power in some form or another. The thing that separates a powerful criminal from other powerful people is that non-criminals use the power ethically, morally, and legally. Clinton failed on two of these grounds.