SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SilentZ who wrote (190829)6/18/2004 3:34:07 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573591
 
Z, So what? I've gotten sexual favors at work under my company's dollars a number of times, and so what?

Maybe you'd like to name the company you work for and provide the details of such "work benefits." Don't want to? I'm not surprised.

At least he was at the office, and not spending months of his time at his Texas ranch while terror warnings were pouring in (yay for low blows! ;) )

I'd rather have a president that thinks with the right head when in the office, especially when it comes to the war on terrorism. Maybe that's why Clinton missed capturing bin Laden three times. (Hey, one low blow deserves another!)

But go ahead and campaign for sexual favors at the work place and in the Oval Office. Larry Flynt would be proud, and the feminists will give you a pass as long as you are "Anyone But Bush." Nothing like continuing the hypocrisy that is destroying the women's lib movement (which, if you think about it, has done more to liberate men than women) ...

Tenchusatsu



To: SilentZ who wrote (190829)6/18/2004 4:10:39 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 1573591
 
>>>>>>>At 14, I'd have a problem. At 21, she's an adult -- nothing wrong there to me.

What about at 21, but drunk? What about at 21, but under the influence of Rohypnol?

The reality is that Lewinsky was an infatuated near-teenager. She could have had consensual sex with lots of people. But the president isn't one of them.

Honestly, the fact that Clinton admitted he did it "because he could" is a blatant statement that he abused his power against this near-teenager. If it were Brittany Spears, I wouldn't be bitching, because she has "been around" and has power of her own. But Monica was a confused child at the time, and Clinton took advantage of the situation.

How anyone can NOT see this is, frankly, beyond me. It does not, however, surprise me when the Left turns a blind eye to it. After all, the Left has no limits beyond which they won't go to get more power for THEMSELVES.



To: SilentZ who wrote (190829)6/18/2004 4:15:28 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573591
 
Lying under oath and obstructing justice, setting a bad moral example, redefining words to squirm out of any legal accoutability

He was being cornered like a rat. It was a witch hunt. I'm not saying he should have lied, but he shouldn't have been there in the first place. Congress spent much more investigating his inconsequential BS which was unrelated to performing his duties in office than they did on the 9/11 commission.


Amen!

ted