Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (190839)	6/18/2004 2:43:23 PM
From: TigerPaw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573352

It wasn't the BJ. The neocons voted impeachment because they could. TP

To: i-node who wrote (190839)	6/18/2004 5:40:12 PM
From: SilentZ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573352

>It was the fact that there was a MASSIVE imbalance of power between the two. Let me give you an example. Suppose it had been a more experience woman, one who had dealt with powerful people before (maybe a Sharon Stone like person). This argument would have been totally nullified and frankly, if Sharon Stone wanted to blow Clinton in the Oval Office, go for it -- because I'm convinced she would have the guts to tell him to f*ck off if she was disinterested. But an inexperienced 20 year old? There is just a basic ethical problem with it. Rock stars have groupies who give 'em BJs and more all the time -- is there anything wrong with that? It's more or less the same thing. -Z