Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: mph who wrote (190840)	6/18/2004 4:24:55 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573433

I completely agree with the second portion of his statement. It is a morally indefensible reason for doing it. That's not to what I'm was referring. Of course, you knew that. What he said is that there are considerable psychological motivations for what he did. Deep motivations that he has to deal with......and no one else. I feel very strongly about sex harassment in the workplace. While I recognize that the Lewinsky affair was consensual, when you have a disparity of power in the workplace, the line between consensual and coercive can easily be blurred. I'm not saying that's what happened in this particular case, but the whole notion of "doing something because (you) can" is grounded in having the superior power, and can lead to abuse when the subordinate's financial well-being is on the line. She was no novice to this kind of thing.....it was her third married man........she was titillated and she thought she was in love with Clinton. Lewinsky is an LA woman.....she was more than up to the challenge. Besides its not your's nor mine's nor anyone's business besides Bill's, Hillary's and Monica's. The GOP made a mt. out of molehill much to the embarrassment of this nation. Its past......time to let it go and let Clinton have his catharsis!