Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (377)	6/18/2004 9:33:25 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4965

The election is about how we grow the national economy - first and foremost. From a growing economy the revenues come to do all else. Until proven other wise I believe a low tax growing economy yields more social welfare than a high tax - slow growth economy - eg - Europe. We have a growing population - much of the growth on the lower end of the economic scale. Without a growing economy there is no opportunity for those in that state. The slow growth socialist model will not work here.

To: Ann Corrigan who wrote (377)	6/20/2004 6:57:52 PM
From: tonto	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4965

Ann, I believe that Bush has been far more successful with what stimulation can be provided from Washington under the circumstances, but I do not believe that he is able to manage a government that is too large. He lacks the experience, as does John Kerry. Neither is a manager, and there are complaints about how the government spending is not being managed. Why do we not have someone capable of controlling the departments run for office, and one who will stand up to the special interest groups as well as the pork barrell spending added to bills by congress? I know many do want this...