SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bush-The Mastermind behind 9/11? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Don Earl who wrote (7093)6/19/2004 12:29:44 PM
From: sea_urchin  Respond to of 20039
 
Don > although I don't know I'd take a psychologists word for it.<

One of the problems in deciding who is "normal" or "not normal" is who says so. In order to objectivize the reference standard it is therefore necessary to employ someone who is "certified", otherwise it's just one person's word against another. So, even though psychologists may be "not normal", as others see them, they are "certified" and that is what makes their opinion more than just an opinion. (pun intended)

> You don't need a weatherman to tell you it's raining.

But it does help to have one as an "expert witness" if one is in a court of law.

What interested me about that psychological assessment is that it's the first time I have seen a professional opinion on W's condition and, indeed, it would seem to be borderline that he is actually insane.



To: Don Earl who wrote (7093)6/19/2004 12:48:16 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 20039
 
there's a lot off insane psychopaths on this board, that's for sure



To: Don Earl who wrote (7093)6/19/2004 1:49:54 PM
From: sea_urchin  Respond to of 20039
 
Don, wind was actually the reason why the WTC towers fell.

I'll bet you didn't know that!

news.yahoo.com

>> The World Trade Center's designers may have severely underestimated the forces that wind exerted on the twin towers, leading them to design skyscrapers less able to handle the Sept. 11 attacks, a federal report says.

Investigators have found that north tower structural components that had been coated with thicker fireproofing during a 1990s upgrade had more than three times the ability to withstand fire than original components in the south tower.

The institute is examining whether fireproofing was a factor in the north tower's ability to stand twice as long as the south tower after it was hit.

The report also details the collapse of 7 World Trade Center, a 47-story building that was not hit by a plane but burned for hours before collapsing that afternoon.<<

"Pulling" is not mentioned.



To: Don Earl who wrote (7093)6/29/2004 1:18:27 PM
From: Thomas M.  Respond to of 20039
 
The other day, somebody was playing PartyPoker with the screen name "WTCReichstag"

:-)

Tom