Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (584101)	6/19/2004 2:53:25 PM
From: Neeka	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Well, I'm not surprised that you can't focus on a question. You said: And you still haven't said if you think Saddam was responsible for 911 And I replied: No, I have never thought SH was responsible for 9/11, because there hasn't ever been a suggestion by anyone I trust to make me believe he did. The only reference to 9/11 in your post are these: The leaders of the Sept. 11 commission called on Vice President Dick Cheney on Friday to turn over any intelligence reports that would support the White House's insistence that there was a close relationship between Saddam Hussein and Al Qaeda. raising the possibility* of a direct tie between Iraq and the Sept. 11 attacks* The Bush administration is not ready to give up on this possibility, and neither am I, but honestly, I really don't care one way or another whether he was or not. I care that we stop terrorist murderers who kill indiscriminantly. Do you know what the word "possibility" means? President Vladimir Putin of Russia said Friday that his country gave intelligence reports to the Bush administration after the Sept. 11 attacks suggesting that Saddam Hussein's government was preparing terrorist attacks in the United States or against American targets overseas. The ties between SH and terrorists is strong, but I don't recall my president and vice president stating emphatically that SH was responsible for 9/11, therefore I never equated the two. I read this somewhere on SI the other day: It's hard to argue about it when people can't get right what the Administration has said in plain English. The NYT is more guilty of this than any other news source in America. They owe the American people an apology.