SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Digital Photography -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (8022)6/20/2004 4:12:55 PM
From: Thomas Mercer-Hursh  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21647
 
Hmmm ... upsampling would rather blow the 640x480 concept, wouldn't it?

I think you are right that some experimentation with prints would be in order, both with respect to print process and image size.



To: Bill Ulrich who wrote (8022)6/20/2004 5:12:20 PM
From: Done, gone.  Respond to of 21647
 
Have you consulted with an offset printer to see how these will print?

Not yet, I'll cross that bridge once I'm sure it's built. (g)

I have been printing select eyemods on my inkjet up to 12x16 inches and Kevin has taken a couple or them to 3x4 feet on a plotter printer for me, to give me an idea how large they can survive. Thus far, awesome results.

But thanks, I'll definitely keep your thoughts in mind.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News