Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Digital Photography -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas Mercer-Hursh who wrote (8042)	6/21/2004 12:21:56 PM
From: elpolvo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21647

thomas- i hope i didn't offend... i wasn't initiating a debate, just sharing some opinions. yours are just as valid. personally, i still think the resolution fits the subject well (for reasons i already stated.) just my opinion and preference... nothing to do with truth or being correct. art appreciation is a largely personal experience. :-) -el

To: Thomas Mercer-Hursh who wrote (8042)	6/21/2004 2:29:57 PM
From: Done, gone.	Respond to of 21647

The Eyemodule2 was state of the art at one time, but these days one can get multi-Mp resolution in a PDA ... probably smaller and less conspicuous than what he has now. He could change, but chooses not to because at this point his vision is linked to the 640x480 image. That's correct. In fact, a while back I purchased a tiny mp3 player with a 2MP camera. In terms of stealth it's even better than the eyemod, but the improved image quality didn't appeal to me, at all. I just could not fall in love with the output. The results it produces look like those from any other decent digicam. I missed the unique "charm" of the eyemod look. I still use the mp3 player but haven't made a snap with the toy for months.