Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Discuss the candidates honestly. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (505)	6/21/2004 5:33:06 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4965

I have totally backed up my statements. Maybe you just weren't paying attention. It's more important however to look forward. This Bush administration is the most dishonest and corrupt in memory. They are not whop they promsied they'd be in 2000, not your father's conservatives and seem to have no conscience whatsoever. It's my opinion that every honest American in any party ought to get together to give these stinkers the big heave ho. After all, thay have had their chance at one-party and failed. Very few can say they' re better off than they were four years ago. Those very few are the only ones Bush-Cheney are really representing, including polluters, oil companies and fat cats with big government contracts.

To: Srexley who wrote (505)	6/22/2004 3:45:40 PM
From: tonto	Respond to of 4965

Very good response to AS. AS, you have the Kerry thread to post your stuff on, please keep your posts here to a discussion level, which is the purpose of this thread. Hello Mr. Spirit. I am happy to discuss these kinds of articles and ideas when info is provided as you eventually did. I am not a liar, and don't like calling people liars unless I am pretty sure they are. Not that I can tell you how to post, but if you say "hey, look at this. It shows that ........" I will discuss in a straightforward way whether I agree or disagree, and let you know why I hold the position I do. Maybe even get me to change in some cases. But when it is just "Bush stole the election" or "there was fraud" without backup, it does not deserve an intelligent response. In this case, it does look like there was an agreement to to clean up this list, but it does not look like fraud to me. I can see how those on your side would assume it was, and when presented with some facts to back up your position, credible discussion can take place. Have a good one, and let's try to have some useful exchanges in the future.