SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : The Epic American Credit and Bond Bubble Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: orkrious who wrote (15757)6/23/2004 2:57:48 PM
From: glenn_a  Respond to of 110194
 
Hi orkrious.

Re: hedging on the "hard asset" side ...

Firstly, I consider myself more of a long-term value-oriented investor. So sort of a rare species these days. FY 2003 was quite kind to my investment portfolio, so for FY2004/2005, my goals are defensive in nature - i.e. to lose as little money as possible. I don't buy futures or options. My particular area of interest is technology, and in particular disruptive technologies and business models. But as a value investor, it's pretty lean pickings these days.

I want to feel comfortable enough with my portfolio that I can ignore my holdings for a two-three month period, and not worry about it in the slightest. Thus, I orient it towards a year or two in the future, while trying to tailor it as much as possible to present conditions.

I take into account macro considerations, particularly credit and monetary conditions, valuations, and business models/strategy when investing. That said, here's how I'm positioning my portfolio:

1 - 50% cash & cash equivalents - mostly CDN$ denominated T-bills. Rationale - safety of principal, deflationary hedge. In a time where liquidity is undervalued in the marketplace, and this situation has continued for some time, I am emphasizing liquidity and safety in my portfolio.

2 - 8% physical bullion; 15% junior precious metals (with a smattering of base metals). Junior equities is an offensive position. I subscribe to Claude Cormier's Ormetal report - and my two largest PM holdings are CKG and CLG. I've also taken positions in Russ's suggestions from time to time. Rationale: Hedge against extreme conditions - inflation or deflation. Physical bullion is to me a near cash equivalent. Also protection against long-term decline in US$, and if we are entering a secular commodity bull, and by some miracle manage to avoid a deflationary collapse of the global economy, precious metals and PM equities should perform well.

3 - 17% junior energy companies. Again, a more aggressive play, though both my holdings here represent good value IMO. Own Real Resources (RER.TO) and Tusk Energy (TKE.TO). Both long-term holdings. Rationale: Inflationary hedge. "Peak Oil" play. Hedge against fall in US$. Play on secular commodity bull.

4 - Technology. 11% of portfolio in Wi-LAN of Calgary. A very pure play on WiMAX. Wi-LAN has core IP at the PHY and MAC layers of the WiMAX solution - i.e. IEEE 802.16 standard. It has long been Wi-LAN's claim that its IP applies to all OFDM-based broadband wireless solutions (not just 802.16/WiMAX)- in particular, 802.11a/g solutions. Interestingly, just today Wi-LAN announced legal action against Cisco for infringement on its OFDM-based patents:

biz.yahoo.com

Rationale: In an otherwise defensive investment portfolio, Wi-LAN is a very aggressive holding. Large potential upside. Reasonable downside protection (but only reasonable; its share price would surely suffer in a broad-based liquidity crunch). Great cost structure. Industry-leading margins. Superb technology. Strategically and operationally top-notch. Leveraged to broadband wireless growth in emerging markets - most specifically China and India. Positioned in an industry at the early stages of very significant S-curve growth (IMO).

I look forward to the day when great technology companies trade at discounts to their business value. But that day sure ain't today. :)

In a nutshell ... that's my strategy.

Anyone else care to share their present strategies?

Regards,
Glenn