Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (191539)	6/23/2004 7:11:22 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574342

factcheck.org

To: TimF who wrote (191539)	6/23/2004 8:23:02 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574342

I wasn't blowing him off. I was responding to his point about nameless web sites. You've linked to them here. I posted stating among other things that they where no reliable or unbiased. You had a problem with that idea but apparently had no problem with ignoring anything in Fox news, even if it is from a major wire service or other source that you normally would consider unbiased. I linked you to those sites to show you the degree of physical abuse perpetrated by the Israelis against the Palestinians. You thought they were staged. I did not. With one pic, Z said it was staged as well and that the Germans had proven it was. End of story........I did not provide those links again. As for Fox you made the comparison, not I.......and yes you're right.......I don't trust Fox. They are just a little too eager to see the president's POV; not a positive characteristic in a democracy. Personally I normally don't care much about the source of an argument. An argument stands or falls on its own merits. The source of specific factual information might be more important, but if you are going to try to exclude every source that you see as conservatively biased and the conservatives return the favor for sites they see as biased to the liberal side, then there won't be too many sources left. Yes, that's right.......I am excluding Fox and the NRO, and the conservatives everyone else. And this gets more stupid by the day. In the beginning CNN was the liberal news outlet and unacceptable to the right. Then any liberal non major site like Salon.com was considered verboten. Then Reuters were included as one of the bad guys. Eventually, all of the American outlets except Fox were considered biased against conservatives. Soon the outlets from the Brits, Aussies, French and the Canadians were in the same boat. Then the Asian outlets became suspect.....and of course, the Muslim sources were never ever considered. So what major outlets are acceptable to the right......why Fox and the NRO of course. The situation so ludicrous I would laugh if it weren't so incredibly true. You all are so out there......so painted into a corner and yet you refuse to open your minds to the possibility that you are out of sync. Its fukking nuts! ted