Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (585018)	6/24/2004 1:01:22 PM
From: DavesM	Respond to of 769670

No, there is no direct evidence that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. But during the Clinton Administration, bin Laden declared war on the United States largely because of its policy of "containing Iraq". Message 20250302 You know, Democrats are digging quite a hole for themselves. If Kerry wins, he has already stated that U.S. troops will remain in Iraq (some supporting him complaining, that there are not enough troops; others supporting him, trying to bring back the draft). Keeping U.S. troops in Iraq by saying that "the Previous Administration lied and falsely led an invasion of Iraq, so now we have to stay - and accomplish all of the Bush Administration's goals in Iraq" - isn't going to fly very well (but a President Kerry will have to make it fly). re: "So Bush has convinced you that Saddam was responsible for 911? Don't you feel like a dupe since he admits that is not true?"