Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Fahrenheit 9/11: Michael Moore's Masterpiece -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JakeStraw who wrote (371)	6/25/2004 11:18:23 AM
From: redfish	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2772

Re Saddam: (1) he has never lied to me; (2) he has never sent American soldiers to die based on lies; (3) he has never humiliated my country before the entire world; (4) he has never willfully refused to pursue the person responsible for the cold-blooded murder of 3,000 innocent Americans.

To: JakeStraw who wrote (371)	6/25/2004 3:30:28 PM
From: Cola Can	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 2772

to side with a murderous nut like Saddam! 1. No one sided with Saddam, only pointed out that Saddam had more credibility than Bush. 2. Saddam was an ally, until Bush Sr. double crossed Saddam. 3. You can label Saddam however you want, but FACTS are he had a secular government and not an islamic fund. government. He also kept a stable country. To survive as a leader in any Middle East country, you have to be a tyrant. Look at the late Shah of Iran. He was hard but had a secular government. Look what happened after he left and the results to the USA. 4. When Saddam was powerful, before the Gulf War, he kept other Islamic countries in check. The USA doesn't have the ally now...thanks to the Bush's, the two worst Presidents in USA history.