Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (191731)	6/25/2004 7:10:11 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1574691

In the beginning CNN was the liberal news outlet and unacceptable to the right. Then any liberal non major site like Salon.com was considered verboten. Then Reuters were included as one of the bad guys. Eventually, all of the American outlets except Fox were considered biased against conservatives. Soon the outlets from the Brits, Aussies, French and the Canadians were in the same boat. They are not considered unacceptable by me. Also at least on this thread I have heard conservative sources called unacceptable or ridiculous far more then liberal sources. Accepting those sources doesn't mean considering them automatically correct but I don't see why any but the weirdest fringe sources should be totally dismissed from consideration. Its ironic that what you call liberal sources are, in fact, mainstream press. I don't even bother to post from the liberal equivalent of the NRO or Fox such as Salon or antiwar.org. If I were, you would see how mainstream CBS, NBC and the WA Post really are. It speaks volumes as to how far to the right we've moved........in fact, too far. Its time to change that. ted