Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Solon who wrote (80805)	6/25/2004 7:20:57 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 82486

But it "don't include an assault on anyone" is NOT a legitimate defense of your position. It wasn't intended to be a defense of the entire position, rather it was a response to your calling such discrimination abuse and mistreatment that we have laws to protect against. There is no attack and nothing to protect against. So there is far less justification for the laws then the other examples you have compared such discrimination to, like rape and poisoning. Other differences include the fact that anti-descrimination don't forbid an abusive action, they compel action, and the fact that there is no natural right to rape or poison, but there is a natural right to choose who you want to associate with or not associate with. So as I said...go to your High Court. Unfortunatly the high court's rulings do not always follow the constitution. Tim