Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (51635)	6/26/2004 1:56:57 AM
From: LindyBill	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 793966

Everybody is on this so much I think the "Times" will have to respond. Mickey Kaus If the New York Times "was provided ... several weeks ago" with that interesting document describing Saddam's Iraq seeking contact with bin Laden--and Iraq subsequently agreeing with Al Qaeda to rebroadcast anti-Saudi propganda--shouldn't the paper have a) told us about it last week when it was hyping the 9-11 Commission as having reported "No Qaeda-Iraq Tie;" and b) somehow gotten the word to Gail Collins' editorialists before they wrote their self-righteous bit proclaiming "there was never any evidence of a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda"?