Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (138111)	6/27/2004 11:31:34 AM
From: DayTraderKidd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

How do you know this? Can you define the nature of the contacts? Was it cooperative? Just bumping heads? >> That is exactly what I said. It is also exactly what you can't do. You have not demonstrated a relationship that warranted an invasion of Iraq, especially before OBL is taken out. ummmm, i think the noose around cuba is already pretty tight. I agree with you that china should have been offered free trade only after hey made significan't reforms. Also, there is no comparison between the brutality of the Taliban Regime and those of china and cuba. lol your not even going to get cheap labor to outsource to with the Taliban. All they had to offer was land for a pipeline. I don't think its a good idea to court a regime in the white house that is harboring an organization that was planning the 911 attacks on our country like the Taliban were. Obviously you see that differently. I thank Moore for allowing us to see that. And when you have it right there on film you can hardly call it a lie without selling out your country in the same sentence like you did.