SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Fahrenheit 9/11: Michael Moore's Masterpiece -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: BEEF JERKEY who wrote (709)6/27/2004 1:14:32 PM
From: epicure  Respond to of 2772
 
From the Christian Science Monitor (hardly a bastion of liberal thinking)...

And for those few poor souls who think that a documentary has to be "objective" to be a documentary, think again (and why in the world they would think Moore should be objective, when Bush and his supporters never are, I'll never know. I guess they hope for better treatment than they give.)

"Is the label "documentary" appropriate for this openly activist movie? Of course it is, unless you cling to some idealized notion of "objective" film that bit the dust at least as far back as 1922, when director Robert Flaherty passed off re-created settings and events as factual footage to enhance the realism of his generally true "Nanook of the North.""

George W. and Me

'Fahrenheit 9/11,' true to its title, is an incendiary film

By David Sterritt | Film critic of The Christian Science Monitor

Michael Moore's new documentary, "Fahrenheit 9/11," never specifically notes the source of its title. But science-fiction buffs will see a reference to "Fahrenheit 451," the Ray Bradbury tale about a future society where "firemen" burn books, all of which the government deems subversive.
Related stories

06/24/04

The uncampaigners: Clinton and Moore

06/18/04

A perfect storm of issue films



E-mail newsletters

Get all of today's headlines, or alerts on specific topics.
Subscribe for free.



E-mail this story


Write a letter to the Editor


Printer-friendly version


Permission to reprint/republish




Mr. Bradbury's book takes its title from the temperature at which paper burns, and an advertising tagline for Mr. Moore's movie speaks of "the temperature where freedom burns."

Since his subject is the Bush administration's response to the deadly attacks of Sept. 11, 2001 - and, he avers, the uncountable flaws, biases, and derelictions of duty woven into the approach to terrorism held by Mr. Bush and company - this is clearly a documentary with a heavy agenda. And not a hidden one, either.

Moore begins the main body of his film by showing footage of President Bush on the morning of Sept. 11, when he began his working day with a reading-appreciation workshop at an elementary school. Shortly into the session, an aide whispers news of the attacks into Mr. Bush's ear, whereupon the president remains in his chair looking very uncertain what to do.

Moore's allegation is that Bush lacks the initiative, and perhaps the intelligence, to take even the simplest sort of action - such as excusing himself from the room to take charge - without having someone give him instructions.

Moore returns often to these squirmingly long minutes, using them to encapsulate his idea of Bush's character and glue together a wide array of video clips, archival images, and satirical interludes. All convey the filmmaker's disdain for what he considers inept and corrupt handling of the Iraq situation.

Is the label "documentary" appropriate for this openly activist movie? Of course it is, unless you cling to some idealized notion of "objective" film that bit the dust at least as far back as 1922, when director Robert Flaherty passed off re-created settings and events as factual footage to enhance the realism of his generally true "Nanook of the North."

Moore makes no pretense of being "fair and balanced." He makes a passionate case for his own perspective, and invites us to agree with him or not. "I fulminate, you decide" could be his motto.

• Rated R for language and violent images