SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (138151)6/27/2004 6:05:48 PM
From: exdaytrader76  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
In which case, China and the Arab world would have a shared goal in driving the US from the middle east. The plundering of Israel is one big fat carrot to dangle in front of the Arabs. N Korea would surely come along for the ride just for fun.

Showdown in Jerusalem...



To: Sidney Reilly who wrote (138151)6/27/2004 7:19:07 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
When they took Tibet we had much more reason to stand up for Tibet than we had to invade Iraq. Tibet was, after all, invaded and annexed by the Chinese. Monks were slaughtered, the land was taken from the Tibetans and ethnic Chinese have been moved in- yes, there were reasons to attack China, or at least say we would- but the big reason against it, is that China is strong.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News