Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer Phud who wrote (178442)	6/29/2004 12:15:05 AM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

"For you to leap to conclusions just shows your lack of understanding about the manufacturing process." WTF? Who leaps to conclusions here? Who "concluded" the the recall issue is about improper removal of passivation layer? Who specifically assured the thread that this is about passivation? As "easy" as that? Who assured the thread that it is a pad problem? Me? Who assured the thread that it is so simple that it it can be fixed and screened at test, while you perfectly know that all parts were already screened, always, and apparently no problem was found at the time? As anyone can see, it is you who jumped to conclusions and offered your completely idiotic, incompetent "explanation". The only conclusion that can be derived here is that either you made a deliberately misleading post to reassure investors and pump the stock, or you have no clue about these issues at all. My personal conclusion that both variants are true. - Ali