Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Srexley who wrote (585893)	6/28/2004 4:26:32 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 769670

"But you all were ready to impeach Clinton....now weren't you" Clinton was impeached. I laid out a pretty effective comparison. Here it is again, and I will wait for you to say it is the same as a man wanting to got to a sex club with his own wife (who divorced him btw). Clinton, a married man cheated on his wife with a gullable young intern who was madly in love with her. I believe the reasoning he has recently given. He did it because he could. That alone is a legitimate thing for some people to find offensive. I think everybody should, but I learned during the episode that if a demo does this, demos say it is ok. They are extremely hypcritical when they claim that is ok, but they are disgusted by Ryan's supposed behavior. That you claim you are disgusted by it is more evidence that you are dishonest. First, of all, the reasoning behind his comment "he could" was because Monica was receptive to his interest........the right has twisted that into something else....noblesse oblige if you will.....a way of being with which the right is very familiar. And to call Lewinsky gullible is a stretch; she was from LA and was on her third married man.....she had her first one in high school. Doesn't sound gullible from where I sit. Please note......the fact that she was from LA speaks volumes....people grow up very fast there......esp. her crowd. But I digress. Clinton did these acts while under investigation for sexual harrasment. Another issue that dems claim to care about (as long as it is done by a republican). Excuse me, because he was under investigation means a grand jury must be convened. Who are you kidding? A judge was questioning Clinton about this, and he decided to lie about it. It wasn't a judge but a grand jury.....there's a difference. This is a felony, and it is why he has been disbarred in Arkansas and is NEVER allowed to argue in front of the supreme court. Maybe even though Clinton has a law degree he did not know it was illegal to lie to a judge, but I doubt it. Its true that its a felony to lie to a grand jury. But what the hell was a grand jury convening over a BJ? You all are ridiculous. And for that, he was impeached. And the demo whiners have been complaining ever since. No outrage the Bill did this stuff. Only outrage at people who are offended by it. Weird. The fact that he committed adultery is not cool. I most agree but what the hell is the GOP complaining about.....after all, Newt Gingrich left his wife in the hospital so he could be with his girlfriend. And if you think Gingrich is the only GOP to commit adultery, think again: bartcop.com So why does the GOP make a big thing over Clinton's BJ? Do I hear hypocrisy? Yes, I think once gain partisan hypocrisy is rearing its ugly head! "We all know how much the GOP hates losers!" Well, I know they don't like you. A dishonest loser that supports terrorism is the worst kind. You know, genius, the only supporters of terrorism on this thread are the ones who support Bush, the best thing that's happen to al Qaida since the conception of the suicide bomber. Deal with it, o wise one. Your knowledge has been tested [see above] and its lacking......big time! No wonder you still support Bush!