Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192102)	6/28/2004 5:05:50 PM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1587510

Ten re: The more rational explanation is that the status quo of America's presence in Korea hasn't changed for decades, even after the end of the Cold War. That's all Clinton ever accomplished in Korea, which isn't that remarkable. Even Carter's trip to North Korea in 1994 only succeeded in procrastination, which was good in one sense but bad in another. The reality, as I see it, is that there isn't a good solution for NK. Invade? I don't think you would support that, I know I wouldn't. It's one of the few countries where political and economic isolation from the world community doesn't seem to work, even in the long term. Popular uprising? I doubt it. I don't know the answer. Bush doesn't know the answer. And Kerry probably doesn't know the answer. So it's silly to kick it around as a litmus test for a candidate. John