Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (586105)	6/28/2004 4:50:13 PM
From: Srexley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

"Why is it that you don't care?" That of course is the issue. It is what taught me what the demo party really is now a days. They HATE people that do care about Clinton's perjury (and his extremely poor judgement to be preying on his interes while there was an active sexual harrasment case against him). When I saw they didn't care, but they did with Bob Packwood (as republicans did also) I saw the light. I think it is tejek who is saying that Ryan's deal is really bad. How can that be, but Clinton's is ok. No credibility at all.

To: one_less who wrote (586105)	6/28/2004 5:21:34 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

So why does the left wing make a big thing over clinton's BJ. If you remember, it was the GOP who convened a grand jury in order to investigate the BJ. His tendency toward lying to voters, and the justice system was. His tendency toward abusing the trust of his constituancy should be a concern for the left wing. Interesting word, "tendency".......what does that really mean to you? Did you catch Clinton lying on many occasions, or just a few? Was he lying over his infidelity, or was he lying about national security or WMDs or al Qa'ida links? And do we have to convene a grand jury to convince you that Bush was lying? The shambles he made of 'women's issues' and the personal abuse he committed on women within his sphere of influence should be a concern for left wingers. Why is it that you don't care? How do you know I don't care? And why is it that women still flock to him if he's made such "a shambles of women's issues"? Shouldn't that be of more concern to you than the caring of a male leftie?