SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Phud who wrote (178448)6/29/2004 1:24:03 AM
From: Ali Chen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
EP, "You know nothing about the subject, much less the specific problem. There are so many clues right under your nose and you can't even see them."

Yeah, and you, the highest expert in the filed, immediately
grasped all clues and announced that it _IS_ a passivation
layer improperly removed, right?

"Here's a hint... many products are produced on this process but only one is showing a problem. Can you guess why? I'll tell you this, even if you went back and got your high school diploma and went on to a PHD you wouldn't be able to know without inside knowledge. There are too many things that are unknown to even the educated, much less you. Why do you think this one would be different from other products on the same process?"

Huh? I thought you already explained this to us, haven't
you? That a glass passivation layer was not etched away from
die pads, right? Isn't it what you revealed originally,
Message 20254028
Ttherefore (my uneducated guess) the I/O pads can't make
an electrical contact with chip carrier through the glass,
a perfect insulator, and it should be
very easy for Intel to catch this on a tester, but they
embarrassingly somehow missed this, passed all internal
validation, and even shipped the product? All without making
those electrical contacts, right, Elmer?

I was wondering too, why would the typical procedure
of de-passivation of die pads on this particular new
chip be any different from thousands of other chips Intel
makes, but hey, you are the expert here, we have to trust
you on this. Right?

I have to agree, this is a fools rant. And the fool,
as appears, is you.

Cheers,

- Ali, LOL.