Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (192270)	6/29/2004 9:11:27 AM
From: zonder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577025

Personally, I prefer basing my views on proof. Otherwise, the slippery slope to pseudo-science appears inevitable. Consider the case of the late Soviet "scientist" Lysenko - he spent his whole life putting out one "intuitive" (according to the principles of Soviet ideology) hypothesis after another - like "stimulating the growth of trees by crowding them on a field" as if they were communist minions - intuitive to them, but really not correct as any scientific observation can show. Since no proof was required and all opposition ended up in Siberia, he had free rein and singlehandedly choked scientific objectivity in the Soviet Union. Not blaming you for anything here, but just pointing out the importance of scientific method of hypothesis, experiment, and proof. Intuition is great if you are guessing whether or not your wife wants roses tonight, but it cannot be a basis for claiming validity of any hypothesis. And all of that is of course just my opinion :-)