Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Road Walker who wrote (192390)	6/29/2004 3:33:17 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577043

re: Don't forget Kerry 1.5, who said back in 1998 that America ought to have disarmed Saddam unilaterally. Is that what Kerry said, or is that the Ten revision 2.3 version? LOL. Ask him about the beta version of Bush. <g> ted

To: Road Walker who wrote (192390)	6/29/2004 4:39:10 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1577043

JF, Is that what Kerry said, or is that the Ten revision 2.3 version? intellectualconservative.com Secondly, a recent report has revealed that Kerry, in 1997, actually supported unilateral military operations to unseat Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Appearing on CNN’s “Crossfire”, on Nov. 12, 1997, the great internationalist even declared that the same UN approval he now preaches for on campaign stops wouldn’t be necessary for then-President Bill Clinton to launch an offensive against Saddam’s regime. “The administration is making it clear they don't even need the UN security council to sign off on a material breach...so furthermore, I think the United States has always reserved the right and will reserve the right to act in its best interests.” He went on to criticize Germany, France, and Russia, asking where their “backbone” was in standing against Hussein. Kerry’s 1997 rhetoric sounds vaguely similar to someone from the present day. Who could that be? Why, President Bush, that’s who. So, the lesson is, if a Democrat is in office, Saddam is fair game, but if a Republican is in office, we’re going to war for Halliburton. There is a very good reason why Kerry is keeping his mouth shut these days, and it all has to do with letting Moveon.org speak on his behalf. At least you know neither Kerry nor Moveon.org would ever flip in their views on President Bush. Tenchusatsu