Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: longnshort who wrote (138324)	6/29/2004 4:18:52 PM
From: Dr. Id	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Thanks for posting the context. While I'm no fan of Hillary Clinton, what she said made sense.

To: longnshort who wrote (138324)	6/29/2004 6:25:28 PM
From: KLP	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

"Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you," Sen. Clinton said. "We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you. We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." YIKES!!! Wonder how many people realize that because 50% of the people pay NO federal taxes, the people making $70,000 plus are considered "rich".... Also wonder how many people really are paying attention to the people who are REALLY rich, and which party they support....Soros, Kerry and Ms. Kerry, Kennedy family, most of the Senators, Striesand, in fact most of Hollywood....etc... Do they all shelter their income in unknown ways to the rest of us....? Or do they simply have so much that it doesn't matter?