Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (192443)	6/29/2004 7:28:56 PM
From: American Spirit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1577886

I never lie on these threads. My girlfriend does have about 40% taken out of her paycheck, like many people. She gets a little back as a refund but still less than the rich pay under Bush. The CLinton 1998 bombings of Saddam were the response to the alarm in 1997, so that was already taken care of. Therefore it's irrelevant what anyone said in 1997 about what to do about Saddam. Want to apologize to the thread for trying to mislead us about Kerry? Also, Kerry's stand on Iraq has been 100% consistent from the beginning. I know. I've studied his speeches. You don't know because you don't care about facts. You don't have anything to attack John on, so you just make up stuff. Also, if Bush had taken Kerry's advice in Iraq we'd have disarmed and maybe deposed Saddam by now and many thsouands of people would still be alive, including more than 1000 Americans. Thousands more would still have their arms, legs, faces. And the tax-payers wouldn't be out 200 billion. Also, Iraq wouldn't be a new breeding ground for Al Qaida.