Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Fahrenheit 9/11: Michael Moore's Masterpiece -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: redfish who wrote (1271)	6/30/2004 9:28:24 AM
From: Selectric II	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2772

How on earth can a party that wants people to think it favors democratic principles "pull out all the stops" to keep a candidate off the ballot? Very, very undemocratic and hypocritical. Bad karma.

To: redfish who wrote (1271)	6/30/2004 10:33:49 AM
From: exdaytrader76	Respond to of 2772

we're back in the Supreme Court. And it's the same Supreme Court as it was in 2000. Quack! Quack!

To: redfish who wrote (1271)	6/30/2004 12:00:55 PM
From: cosmicforce	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2772

Who are these reports of terror coming from? BUSH! Now that is scary. People have forgotten the "heightened alert" knee jerks. Now the administration is trying to make people afraid that the voting process would be disrupted. Think about it. Who benefits from a change of government besides the American people? There is no reason in the world why Muslims (radical, moderate or friendly) WOULDN'T want a change of regime in the US. Some would say that is letting them win. And in this sense if GWB was to disrupt the elections or hints that they would be, HE wins. He's already gone on live TV and said that he'd prefer a dictatorship. I guess my point of view is this: if we give up our democratic rights in this country, they win. If we give in to fear, they win. If GWB gets re-elected, everyone who isn't part of that cabal loses.